{"id":8819,"date":"2021-02-27T11:47:45","date_gmt":"2021-02-27T09:47:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.theotokos.co.za\/?p=8819"},"modified":"2021-02-28T07:53:38","modified_gmt":"2021-02-28T05:53:38","slug":"sspx-rome-without-a-pope-bergoglio-is-there-but-not-peter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.theotokos.co.za\/?p=8819","title":{"rendered":"SSPX: “Rome without a pope. Bergoglio is there, but not Peter.”"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Fb-Button\"\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>
<\/fb:like><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>\n

“Rome without a pope. Bergoglio is there, but not Peter.”<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

That was the title of an article on the SSPX News website on 26 February 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Rome<\/a>
Tweet: Rome without a pope – SSPX News 2021-02-26<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

“You are not authorized to access this page.<\/em><\/span>\u201d<\/s><\/p>\n\n\n\n

UPDATE 28 Feb<\/span><\/span><\/strong>: The article is now publicly accessible. Most likely accidentally published and then withdrawn until now.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The page is either private or no longer<\/s> exists. But it did. As did the tweet indicating it was published. The tweet appeared late on Friday evening, 26 February 2021, and was later deleted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n